Surge in CEO Turnover Among U.S. Companies This Year
Advertisements
The rapidly changing landscape of corporate leadership in America has become a hot topic among investors and analysts alike. This trend of frequent Chief Executive Officer (CEO) turnover has been particularly pronounced in 2023, with companies facing heightened scrutiny as they grapple with underwhelming performance against a backdrop of robust economic conditions. The impatience of investors and stakeholders is palpable, especially given the stark contrast between strong market environments and the disappointing results of some well-known firms.
According to data from the recruitment firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a staggering 327 CEO changes were announced by publicly traded companies in the United States up to November this year. This figure represents the highest number recorded since the company began tracking this data in 2010, and it marks an increase of 8.6% compared to the previous year. The noteworthy aspect of this turnover is the presence of several household names like Boeing, Nike, and Starbucks among those undergoing leadership changes.
The rapid succession at the top underscores a growing impatience among customers, investors, hedge funds, and boards of directors. Companies are facing immense pressure to address performance slips and strategic missteps quickly, particularly in a time when consumer spending is encouraged, and economic indicators are generally positive. As Clarke Murphy, Managing Director at leadership consulting firm Russell Reynolds Associates, pointed out, “The cost of capital and the pace of transformation are accelerating the turnover of CEOs.” He noted that in years when the S&P 500 has delivered returns exceeding 20%, any company exhibiting poor performance becomes the center of attention, leading to quicker boardroom changes than in the past decades.
Among the significant leadership shake-ups this year are:
**Intel:** In a significant and somewhat dramatic move, Intel Corporation decided to part ways with its CEO, Pat Gelsinger, earlier this month. Gelsinger assumed the role nearly four years ago with the ambitious goal of revitalizing the company and enhancing its competitive stance. While the rise of artificial intelligence has benefitted competitors like Nvidia, Intel has struggled to establish itself in this burgeoning field, resulting in a considerable decline in both its stock price and market share. As of now, the company has yet to announce Gelsinger’s successor.
**Boeing:** Boeing also made headlines earlier this year when it announced that CEO David Calhoun would be stepping down in what was described as a wide-ranging executive overhaul. The announcement came in the wake of a concerning incident involving an Alaska Airlines-operated Boeing 737 Max 9—a nearly new aircraft—where an emergency exit door detached mid-flight. This event brought Boeing back into the spotlight regarding safety concerns, which had already plagued the company for years following previous crises. Calhoun had taken the reins in late 2019, succeeding Dennis Muilenburg, who resigned after repeated 737 Max crashes. Kelly Ortberg, the former CEO of Rockwell Collins, took over in August but faced challenges, including announcing layoffs and cost-cutting measures shortly after assuming the position.
**Starbucks:** Starbucks found itself in a difficult position as it faced declining sales in its largest market, prompting the company to hire Brian Niccol, the star CEO of Chipotle Mexican Grill, to replace Laxman Narasimhan. Niccol’s appointment in August was greeted positively, resulting in a nearly 25% surge in the company's stock. In the first 100 days of his leadership, Niccol unveiled a strategy aimed at returning the brand to its core identity, focusing on enhancing customer appeal, streamlining menu options, and speeding up service.
**Nike:** The athletic apparel giant Nike also underwent a noteworthy transition, appointing Elliott Hill as the new CEO this September. Hill, who has been with the company since the 1980s as a trainee, steps into the role vacated by John Donahoe. Under Donahoe's leadership, Nike saw impressive revenue growth from $39.1 billion in fiscal 2019 to a projected $51.4 billion for fiscal 2024. However, his strategy of distancing from wholesale partners like Foot Locker and Macy’s, coupled with a perceived lack of innovation, ultimately stymied growth and led to his departure.
**Peloton:** Peloton, once a darling of the home fitness industry during the pandemic, has struggled as the world shifted back to normalcy. The company appointed Barry McCarthy, a former executive from Spotify and Netflix, as CEO in early 2022, replacing its founder, John Foley. However, after announcing another restructuring, McCarthy departed in May. In October, Peloton appointed Peter Stern, a former Ford executive and co-founder of Apple Fitness+, as its new CEO. Stern’s background in developing subscription-based services has raised hopes on Wall Street for a renewed focus on profitability through cost-cutting and an emphasis on high-margin subscription revenues.
**Kohl's:** In the retail sector, Kohl's has seen its CEO, Tom Kingsbury, announce his departure scheduled for mid-December, after the company reported declining comparable store sales over the past eleven quarters, resulting in a decreasing stock price. Ashley Buchanan, set to take over, faces the challenge of reinvigorating a struggling department store chain.
**WW International:** Formerly known as Weight Watchers, WW International has also been facing substantial challenges, epitomized by the announcement of CEO Sima Sistani’s immediate exit in September. The company has been navigating a difficult path, experiencing a staggering 80% decline in share price this year. During Sistani's tenure, WW attempted a repositioning strategy, linking customers to trending weight-loss medications, which has yet to yield desired results.
This surge in CEO turnover signifies a broader trend within American corporate culture, where performance accountability is increasingly demanded by investors and stakeholders. As competition intensifies and market dynamics evolve, companies must adapt quickly to maintain relevance and success. Leadership changes, while disruptive, can also signal a necessary recalibration for organizations seeking renewed vigor in today’s fast-paced economic landscape. As we look ahead, it will be interesting to see how these changes influence the corporate strategies of some of America’s most recognizable and historically successful companies in the months to come.